DIREKT Interview Note Template¶
Store only anonymized, minimized notes in the public repository. Raw recordings, consent records, contact details and identifying documents belong in an approved private system.
Session metadata¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Research evidence ID | EV-YYYYMMDD-### |
| Participant code | |
| Segment | Customer / Provider / Operations / Institutional / Authority |
| Broad area | |
| Provider category, if relevant | |
| Date | |
| Researcher | |
| Method | Interview / Observation / Concept test / Document walkthrough |
| Consent for written notes | Yes / No |
| Consent for private recording | Yes / No / Not requested |
| Follow-up permitted | Yes / No |
Context¶
Briefly describe why this participant and session are relevant. Do not include names, exact addresses or unique identifying details.
Recent real behaviour¶
- Need or task:
- How the participant currently handles it:
- Channels used:
- Location method:
- Trust evidence considered:
- Payment/contact behaviour:
- Failure or friction:
Key statements¶
Paraphrase by default. Use short anonymized quotations only when wording is necessary for product language and re-identification risk is low.
Observed behaviour¶
Record observable actions separately from interpretation.
Evidence or document types discussed¶
| Type | Issuer/source | Expiry/renewal described | Public confirmation route known? | Privacy concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Do not record document numbers or personal identifiers.
Trust-claim comprehension¶
| Synthetic claim | Participant explanation | Correct? | Confusion or misleading implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phone confirmed | |||
| Identity checked | |||
| Qualification checked | |||
| Premises visited | |||
| Check expired | |||
| Check pending | |||
| Sponsored listing |
Device and connectivity¶
- Device class:
- Android version, if known and consented:
- Shared device or multiple SIMs:
- Connectivity condition:
- Data/storage/battery constraint:
- Accessibility need:
- Input preference:
Findings¶
Supported¶
Contradicted¶
New assumption or risk¶
Contradictory evidence¶
Design or operational implication¶
Assumptions affected¶
List IDs from ASSUMPTIONS_REGISTER.md:
A-___— proposed status/evidence update:
Follow-up¶
- Additional participant segment needed:
- Authority or legal question:
- Prototype change to test:
- Evidence gap:
Privacy review¶
- [ ] no participant name;
- [ ] no phone/email;
- [ ] no exact private location;
- [ ] no document or registration number;
- [ ] no real document image;
- [ ] no unproven allegation identifying a person/business;
- [ ] quotations reviewed for re-identification;
- [ ] source material stored privately or deleted under protocol.
Research lead review¶
- Reviewer:
- Date:
- Accepted into synthesis: Yes / No / Needs correction
- Research-log entry: